Linux za Sve forum

Ženska Logika

* “Yes” = No

* “No” = Yes

* “Maybe” = No

* “I’m sorry” = You’ll be sorry

* “We need” = I want

* “It’s your decision” = The correct decision should be obvious by now

* “Do what you want” = You’ll pay for this later

* “We need to talk” = I need to complain

* “Sure go ahead” = I don’t want you to

* “I’m not upset” = Of course I’m upset, you moron!

* “You’re so manly” = You need a shave and you sweat a lot

* “Be romantic, turn out the lights” = I have flabby thighs

* “This kitchen is so inconvenient” = I want a new house

* “I want new curtains” = and carpeting, and furniture, and wallpaper

* “I heard a noise” = I noticed you were almost asleep

* “Do you love me?” = I’m going to ask for something expensive

* “I’ll be ready in a minute” = Just going to wash my hair

* “You have to learn to communicate” = Just agree with me

* “Are you listening to me!?” = Too late, you’re dead

* “How much do you love me?” = I did something you’re going to hate

Šta je to: tu ti tu rum tu tu tu?

Ingrid u hotelu u Briselu naručuje dva čaja u sobu 222...

Tip iz mog sela popravlja traktor

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 <at> srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>
> There's only one signing authority, and they only sign PE binaries.

Guys, this is not a dick-sucking contest.

If you want to parse PE binaries, go right ahead.

If Red Hat wants to deep-throat Microsoft, that's *your* issue. That
has nothing what-so-ever to do with the kernel I maintain. It's
trivial for you guys to have a signing machine that parses the PE
binary, verifies the signatures, and signs the resulting keys with
your own key. You already wrote the code, for chissake, it's in that
f*cking pull request.

Why should *I* care? Why should the kernel care about some idiotic "we
only sign PE binaries" stupidity? We support X.509, which is the
standard for signing.

Do this in user land on a trusted machine. There is zero excuse for
doing it in the kernel.

Linus